Increasingly more question the gold rally

Increasingly, folks are questioning the sustainability of the gold’s rally.

From Jan Harvey, Reuters:

A rise in real interest rates is perhaps the biggest threat to stronger gold prices as they increase the opportunity cost of holding the metal rather than higher yielding instruments. In a note this month, Goldman Sachs said a stronger U.S. growth picture may prompt just such a rate rise, and  consequently a turn in the gold market cycle, next year.

“Our… modeling suggests that the improving U.S. growth outlook will outweigh any Fed balance sheet expansion, and that the cycle in gold prices is near an inflection point,” it said.

The latest report by the World Gold Council (WGC) shows data that the speculative money has been rallying gold via ETFs and that an actual, physical demand for the metal is negligible, if that. The most often cited reason for such speculation has been a belief that Fed’s QE is somehow bullish for the metal.

“The environment for gold is good, but it isn’t improving further by the day, so some slowdown in the uptrend in gold should be expected. The days of very easy gains, when you could just buy gold, hold it, and see it rise 10, 11, 12 percent each year are over,” says Credit Suisse analyst Tobias Merath.

Meanwhile, many have forecasted some sort of a blow-off rally in gold, similar to the one in oil in 2008, as a culmination of the gold bubble. It may turn out, regrettably, that no such repetition could clearly mark the end of the rally.

Instead, the slowly creeping rise in interest rates – as is foreshadowed by the move in the bank stocks and the turn in their long-term moving average curve -  could grind out the gold bugs into slow losses and continuing whining.

Global gold market in Q3

From the latest Gold Demand Trends Q3 2012, World Gold Council (WGC):

Q3 investment demand (the sum of ETFs and similar products, and total bar and coin demand) was 79.5 tonnes – or 16% – lower than Q3 2011. In value terms this amounted to US$22.8bn.

So, while overall demand dropped, demand by the ETF – the speculative class not interested in the metal per se but interested to speculate on price – has gone up:

On a year-on-year basis, ETF demand was the strongest performing sector, generating a 48.6 tonne increase in demand. At 136.0 tonnes, Q3 was the strongest quarter since Q2 2010 and compares with a 5-year quarterly average of 88.9 tonnes.

Noteworthy is that ETFs tied up 17% of gold tonnage in Q3’11 versus the larger percent of 32% in Q3’12.

This means that gold paper holdings – the ones that can be liquidated much faster than the physical holdings – have gone higher in proportion to the physical stock. This further means that risks on the downside, due to the fast liquidation, have also risen.

In China, speculators took to the side because there was no price appreciation momentum, while in Turkey, where gold gifting is popular, people sold off their holding taking profit.

Full report available here.

Speculators cut bullish bets in key commodities

Speculators have cut their bullish bets on a several key commodities as the dollar surged higher on Friday.

Speculators have cut down on their bullish bets in oil by 8,779 contracts and increased their short positions by 6,698 contracts for a net bearish looking position of 15,477 contracts.

Bullish bets on gold were also slashed by 9,992 contracts but betting short was much smaller to 2,142 contracts indicating that some still hope gold will turn bullish again.

Bullish bets on copper – a key industrial indicator with a huge correlation with stocks – were also slashed. Bullish bets were slashed by 4,182 contracts and short bets rose by 6,921 contracts.

Bearish action in copper maybe related to 3 different things: rise in the dollar, less-than stellar expectations for Chinese rebound and too much (and uncertainly high) copper inventory in Shanghai bonded warehouses.

“Stocks held in bonded warehouses in China may be almost three times larger than those monitored by the London Metal Exchange, according to an estimate this week from researcher Wood Mackenzie,” reported Bloomberg last week.

The concern is that slow to recover China’s economy may fail to absorb these huge copper inventories, forcing the owners to re-export the metal back to the global markets – and that could tank the price.

“Given how low copper prices are now, it would make sense for smelters to put excess supplies under financing until the markets recover. To do that, they’ll have to put them in warehouses and get receipts,” CIFCO Futures analyst Zhou Jie said.

Gold’s negative reaction to the rise in the dollar, despite an ongoing QE, is another piece of evidence that casts doubt that being bullish on gold should be predicated solely on the amount of new currency printed by the Fed. This, however, maybe short term effect.

“In the short term gold may hover around Friday’s low, but there isn’t much room on the downside as easing monetary policy is still a global trend,” said Li Ning, an analyst at Shanghai CIFCO Futures.

Others think the bullish dollar effect predicated on strenghthening of the economy will prevail.

“But the dollar looks likely to maintain its uptrend. The dollar charts look bullish and better economic fundamentals in the U.S. compared to Japan’s also favour the dollar,” says Teppei Ino, currency analyst at the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ.

Do gold bears make more sense looking ahead

UBS commodities analyst Tom Price says that gold is set up for a fall because people are deleveraging while those who hold gold positions are too crowded into an ETF which will have to liquidate the huge amounts of gold it is tying up out of the world supply.

“Instead of spending you have deleveraging going on, people are taking cash and paying down debt, that’s a bearish sign [for gold],” says Price.

Put another way, people find equity-building of their non-gold asset a more valuable financial endeavor than stashing cash in gold. If so, than there is an upper limit to the gold price.

Price also says that the ETFs are tying up too much of the global supply of gold.

“The SPDR gold fund has more gold holdings than the French central bank, if investors decide to get out, you have physical sales which will impact the price of gold,” says Price.


The CPI index growth has been declining during most of the years when gold was the raging bull.

Of course, we do not have a time frame on this bearish gold call but one is to surmise that once we move into a decreasing negative yield environment all of the currency hedgers would spark the sell-off in the gold ETF.

What makes Price’s argument about gold more consistent with reality is that it is not predicated on beliefs that are yet to materialize if ever.

For example, recent report by the World Gold Council’s (WGC) says that, besides negative yields, the inflation and uncertainty risk are one of the variables that fuel the piling into the gold ETF trade.

However, the CPI index growth, as the chart above shows, has been declining during most of the years when gold was the raging bull.
 
Uncertainty risk is another fav of the gold bulls saying that owning gold is the best way to protect one’s wealth but this goes against the fact that people are more interested in building equity in the non-gold asset they already own rather than holding gold bars.

All of these rather imaginary bullish arguments may drive people into the gold ETF but the longer this phantom reason fail to materialize the greater the chance of an outcome Price is talking about.

The worst part is that some folks are formulating an economic policy based on some of these rather fictitious gold-based reasons.

Commodities see record funds inflow

Commodity funds saw a strong inflow of funds in September registering a $2.37 billion in net cash inflows, a number just shy of the August record of $2.45 billion, Lipper data showed on Thursday.

There are some 230 US regulated commodity products of which precious metals, gold in particular, saw the biggest cash inflow.

Of the $2.37 billion in inflows, $1.74 billion was moved into SPDR Gold Shares in September, a number little lower than the August inflow of $2 billion into this gold ETF.

Second place went to the iShares Gold Trust with $610 million.

Largest gold ETFs are now holding up 75 million ounces of gold for the speculative purposes of traders which accounts for about 84% of world gold annual production.

ETFs are estimated to now hold 2,126 tons of gold against annual gold production estimated for 2011 to be about 2,500 tons.

Total net value for all commodities and fund gained in value in September to $178 billion from August’s level of about $167 billion.

WGC report lists beliefs that fuel gold price

World Gold Council’s (WGC) latest Quarterly statistics blames the unconventional monetary policies across the globe aimed at reflation and says that such policies create 4 rationales that drive cash into gold and subsequently fuel the price higher.

There is a consensus that these policies drive investment into gold purely due to inflation-risk impact. We believe that there is not one but four principal factors that provide further support to the investment case for gold:

– Inflation risk
– Medium-term tail-risk from imbalances
– Currency debasement and uncertainty
– Low real rates and emerging market real rate differentials

WGC says that inflation risk is the strongest rationale for stashing cash into gold although we are yet to see these high inflation numbers in the actual data. As a result, among the beautiful charts that the WGC has published in this report we, for sure, do not see the gold price vs CPI overlay.

“There is a well-established relationship between the amount of money in an economy and the rate of inflation – whereby too much money chasing too few goods causes price appreciation. However, this is not a straightforward relationship,” says WGC.

Hm? A “well-established relationship” that is not “straightforward”?

Aside from the list of beliefs in the quote box above, it is rather hard to find any actual end use demand for gold: Jewelry is unpopular in many places where it is prized, while gold stashing by central banks in Turkey, Russia and elsewhere not only has a mild demand impact but could perhaps be used as a contrarian indicator because central banks are not just less investment savvy but are more concerned with things like liquidity, Forex reserve size and stability, balance sheets…

This leaves us with the ETF demand which, obviously, WGC loves to be obscure about or skip altogether.

For example, in December 2011, gold ETF, GLD, experienced 2.247 billion net outflow meaning speculators who have no interest in physical gold cashed in and the gold price went from circa $1,800 to about $1,500.

Now, none of the variables in the quote box in December have had any substantial change in August of 2012 when gold price took off and commodity ETFs got a positive 2.4% inflow.

In fact, the CPI number in December was on the decline yet the gold price was on the rise – so much for not so “straightforward” and WGC’s bogus reasons as to why gold is being whip-sawed.

We can, meanwhile, peruse WGC’s report to enjoy all kinds of reasons that attempt to justify gold’s high price even though none of them are major causes.

More on M1, velocity & gold price here.

Barclays opens gold storage vault in London

Barclays has opened its first precious metals vault in London in response to the huge demand for holding gold.

“We’ve built the vault in response to customer demand, people wanted to store gold in a Barclays vault. There’s a changing nature that we’re seeing in the gold market that now people want an asset that is either allocated or unallocated metal. Since QE3, the number of inquiries to store precious metals has gone up,” Barclays product manager for metals said.

Barclays “anticipates demand from pension funds, central banks and sovereign wealth funds who have been scooping up the precious metal that has doubled in value since late 2008.”

“For many years, vaulting wasn’t particularly interesting. It has changed dramatically along with why people want to do it. Ten years ago, people were not that bothered about gold or what it was or where it was held, but now they are very bothered,” saysBarclays.

Gold ownership, for many is done via the ETFs, so along with them as customer BArclays sees large pension funds and sovereigns.

“It’s been remarkable enough since QE3 (was announced) that we’ve had people come on. I was on the phone to a sovereign wealth fund who haven’t been involved with precious metals at all. So you are seeing new faces and new names come in like that, so there is no particular let-up,”  says Barclays.

Just because all these folks have so much cash, are they the smart money or dumb money?

With bullish technicals and an automatic sentiment that drives cash into the gold ETFs on any QE, gold may perhaps hit into new highs – say $2400 – but as the chart above shows, monthly gold price changes as a proxy for volatility has been on a steady rise since 2004 and if we are to look at what happened to bond yields during such volatility spikes in 1972 & 1980 one may extrapolate that we could be setting up for the same soon. If so, interest in these vaults may go back to the way it was.

Finally, there could be some discussion as to whether non-producing gold ownership can be classified as an “asset” given that it has no capacity to provide, based on the International Accounting Standards Board definition, “future economic benefits [that] are expected to flow to the enterprise” other than price gains via speculation. This issue also touches upon the legal premises upon which many of the ETFs issue shares against gold holdings given that shares are claims to assets engaged in income production rather than price speculation. Legislators need to indeed reexamine all this.

Bullish bets on copper, gold rise sharply

Speculators have loaded up on bullish copper and gold contracts citing the Fed’s QE and in anticipation of more ECB action and possibly coordinated central bank action.

“It’s a response to the very aggressive move by the ECB and anticipation of more coordinated central-bank actions. The ramifications are bullish not just for the global economy but also for risk-on markets like copper,” said Adam Sarhan, chief executive of Sarhan Capital.

Gold demand down in Q2, report

Gold demand for the second quarter of 2012 was down 7% from previous year’s Q2 and down 10% from the previous quarter says the latest report by the World Gold Council (WGC).

Even though central banks were the biggest buyers of gold, that increase was offset by a decline in jewelry in India and China, countries that account for 45% of global jewelry demand.

“Demand for ETFs and similar products in Q2 was broadly flat year-on-year, as new demand was marginally outweighed by selling. The lucklustre net figure was reflective of the directionless price action in gold,” says WGC.

Demand for physical gold – bars and coins – was up in Middle East, Turkey and Europe while demand was down in the US.

“A 15% year-on-year increase in European demand for gold bars and coins confirmed the strength of conviction among investors in gold’s capital preservation properties,” notes WGC alluding to fears of the break up of the Euro.

Central banks were also big gold buyers while c.bank sales were “muted” with Germany selling 0.7 tons in June to mint commemorative gold coins.

The 157.5 Q2 tons of c.bank purchases in Q2 is more then double the 66.2 tons bought by central banks last year. For the H2, central banks bought 254.2 tons, up 23% from same time last year.

WGC notes purchase plans by Kazakhstan, Philippines, Russia, Ukraine, Korea along with small purchases in Europe (Serbia) and South America (Guatemala) and Asia (Kyrgyz).

“Turkey continued to record increases in gold reserves… recent legislation allows [Turkish] commercial banks to pledge gold as part of their reserve requirements to the central bank… the increase in reserves reflects the growing role of gold in the evolving international financial structure,” says WGC.

WGC puts Russia into gold focus as its c.bank is very aggressive in buying gold with its reserves swelling up in the metal.

“Over the past decade… 1,300 tonnes of gold have been accumulated in Russia… over half of these above ground stocks are held privately in jewelry form and approximately 36% as official stocks,” says WGC.

Full report available here.

M1, velocity & gold price

Gold and money still remain the great intellectual debate in the economics circles with polarized sides that, on one end (hard money), argue that absence of gold as the monetary anchor is responsible for the loss of dollar’s value over time, while others (fiat money) argue that anchoring the dollar to the gold would unnecessarily constrain the monetary policy in times of crisis, particularly during episodes of debt deflation, so that the economy would unduly suffer because of inability to deliver sharp monetary easing.

We see these two intellectual schools unfolding, and not just along political lines, but also in the gold market, monetary policy and the demand for money.

Gold price has been rising rapidly, particularly since circa 2003 and the broad spectrum of the hard money folks would say that the reason for such spectacular rise in gold price is because the Fed is pumping in an unprecedented amount of fiat currency.

The fiat money folks often lack an explanation as to why gold is spiking so much but, to their credit, that lack of explanation does not mean that there isn’t one. Instead, fiat folks say that money printing did escalate since circa 2008 but that is as a response to a collapse in the velocity of money: in October of 2007, the velocity index stood at 10.367 and as of January 2012 the index is at 6.958, a 32.9% decrease in the velocity of money.

By comparison, the M1 money supply measure in October of 2007 was $1376.3 billion while in January 2012 the M1 stood at $2216.3 billion, a 37.9% increase – roughly equal to the rate of fall of the money velocity.

A 2010 World Gold Council (WGC) study, however, shows that spikes in M1, among other things, are positively correlated with the price of gold. In fact, WGC says that M1 is directly responsible for gold price effects.

“The analysis suggests that a 1% change in money supply in the United States six month ago produces, on average, a 0.9% increase in the price of gold today, assuming the money supply in the other regions does not change,” writes WGC.

A powerful conclusion like this typically conjures up a perception that a 1% spike in M1 spikes gold 0.9% because M1 rarely goes lower. In fact, out of 449 datapoints on M1 since January 1975, only 97 of them show M1 contraction, and this 21.6% contractionary (78.4% expansionary) occurrence is mostly concentrated in times when the Fed is looking for ways to constrain the red-hot economy.

So, if M1 is expanding in 78.4% of instances, then what causes the gold price to go negative or flat such as it did in the vast 20 year period from circa 1985-2003?

Irrespective of the answer, the very presence of this question casts some doubt at the findings that M1 has such a large, almost 1-for-1 influence on the price of gold.

Another variable to look at is the effect of the velocity of money on gold. It is reasonable to hypothesize, along the hard money thought, that an increase in the velocity of money would spike the gold price but the data does not always correspond to this hypothesis.

For example, from October 1993 to October 2000, the velocity of money was on a sharp upswing going from 6.071 to 9.267 yet the price of gold went from $355.5 to $273.7.

WGC study, however, assigns predictive power to the gold price.

“A simple empirical regression model tells us that a 10% increase in the price of gold tends to increase the velocity of money in the US by about 0.4% in 12 months time,” finds WGC.

This finding suggests that the hypothesis that money velocity impacts gold is wrong and instead needs to be reversed – that gold price change impacts monetary velocity.

This, of course, is again contrary to the 1993-2000 data on these two variables because the gold price change during that period tended to be negative while M1 was rising.

More importantly, the conclusion that gold price change has something to do with the change in M1 rate of change is problematic on the fundamental level: it is like arguing that the change in the speedometer causes your foot to press harder on the pedal. Mathematically, the statement is totally wrong because it says that the first derivative determines the behavior of the second one.

At this point, of course, we are entering the great intellectual realm of hard vs. fiat money with hard money folks, like the Austrian economists, who would tend to argue that inflationary expectations is what drives the the price of gold. Again, just because fiat money people are mute on this point it does not mean that there is no explanation.

Having said all this, if we take the data that WGC is basing its conclusions – gold price and M1 measures from January 1975 to now – and break up the data into various periods, we can find different levels of correlation.

For the overall period, for example, the correlation coefficient is 0.73 meaning that M1 and gold price move in the same direction 73% of the time. However, during certain periods the correlation is different.

For example, for the 1975-1986 period, the correlation coefficient is 0.48 meaning that 48% of the time the gold price has moved in the same direction as the M1. However, between 1987-1998, the correlation coefficient is -0.48 meaning that 48% of the time gold went into the opposite direction from M1.

Since breaking up the data different ways yields different correlation coefficients, the results are very intriguing if the data is broken into 2 periods, from January 1975 to March 2003, and April 2003 to present.

For January 1975 to March 2003, correlation coefficient between M1 and gold was a small 0.16 while from April 2003 onwards the correlation jumps to a remarkable 0.95.

Now, April 2003 is not an arbitrarily chosen point but a rather deliberate one because it is the date that the first gold ETF began its full month’s operation.

On March 28, 2003, Gold Bullion Securities listed the first ETF on the Australian Stock Exchange, an event that was mimicked well in other large markets several times over.

Since then, gold price has been on a tear taking a pause only during the darkest days of the recent Great Recession. Yet since, gold has been disjointed completely from the velocity of money and has been following the growth of M1 or the rise in availability of cash which now has an unprecedented access to “imaginary” gold via the ETFs.

During this period, the velocity of money has been collapsing so the model where gold price has some predictive power over money velocity appears as a gobbly-gook.

More significantly, the data seems to suggest that synthetic financial products like the ETFs that offer non-physical gold (i.e. imaginary) have finally linked the M1 to gold where such link exhibited only a mild correlation prior to the their appearance.

The cost of such linkage have been mounting since 2003, and not just because of gold, but because other commodities, particularly oil, are being traded under imaginary ownership terms and amount to a massive wealth transfer from consumers to financial syndicates that are peddling such bets.